Evaluasi Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) Berbasis Digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59240/kjsk.v6i3.1100Keywords:
educational assessment, islamic religious education, digital assessment, blended assessmentAbstract
Digital transformation in education requires changes in learning assessment approaches, including in Islamic Religious Education (PAI). This article aims to analyze the concepts, urgency, approaches, and implementation of digital-based PAI assessment and its implications for improving learning quality. This study employs a literature review method by examining and analyzing relevant scholarly literature on educational assessment, digital technology, and PAI learning. The findings indicate that digital-based PAI assessment not only improves the efficiency, flexibility, objectivity, and transparency of assessment but also enables continuous evaluation through the utilization of learning data and students’ learning traces. The review also reveals that the effectiveness of digital assessment remains constrained by limited infrastructure, unequal access, digital literacy gaps, and risks related to academic ethics and integrity. In the context of PAI, the use of technology must preserve spiritual, character-building, and humanistic dimensions. Therefore, a blended assessment approach offers a strategic alternative by integrating the advantages of digital technology with pedagogical interaction and the continuous cultivation of Islamic values.
References
Anderson, L. W. (2015). Revisiting Bloom’s taxonomy. Educational Psychologist, 12–25.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
Brookhart, S. M. (2015). How to design questions and tasks to assess student thinking. ASCD Journal, 45–60.
Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 21–34.
Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5–6), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816
Gagné, R. M. (2015). Principles of instructional design. Cengage Learning.
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020). Panduan pembelajaran berbasis teknologi. Kemendikbud.
Munir. (2016). Multimedia dan konsep aplikasi dalam pendidikan. Alfabeta.
Munir. (2017). Pembelajaran digital. Alfabeta.
OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning. OECD Education Working Papers, 22–35.
OECD. (2021). OECD digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with AI, blockchain and robots. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en
Prensky, M. (2016). Education to better their world: Unleashing the power of 21st-century kids. Teachers College Press.
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Rusman. (2016). Model-model pembelajaran. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Rusman. (2017). Belajar dan pembelajaran berbasis komputer. Alfabeta.
Rusman. (2018). Pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi dan komunikasi. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Schunk, D. H. (2016). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson.
Selwyn, N. (2013). Digital technology and the contemporary university: On some research issues. Distances et Médiations des Savoirs, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.4000/dms.369
Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Polity Press.
Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213498851
Sudijono, A. (2015). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sudjana, N. (2016). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Tilaar, H. A. R. (2016). Paradigma baru pendidikan nasional. Rineka Cipta.
UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common good? UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2018). Education in a digital world. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2021). Digital learning guidelines. UNESCO Publishing.
Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2017). Computational thinking in education. Educational Research Review, 21, 1–13.
Voogt, J. (2016). Teacher learning in technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1–10.
Voogt, J. (2017). Professional development for digital teaching. Computers & Education, 1–12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rahmat, Zulkifli Musthan, Abd. Kadir, Muh, Shaleh, Anirwan, Halik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
