Etika Sosial dalam Al-Qur'an: Perspektif Ibnu Khaldun dan Kritik terhadap Pandangan Karl Marx tentang Agama
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59240/kjsk.v5i1.163Keywords:
social ethics, Ibn Khaldun, religion and society, social justiceAbstract
This study provides an in-depth examination of the concept of social ethics as articulated in the Qur’an and the sociological thought of Ibn Khaldūn, while critically engaging with Karl Marx’s critique of religion from these perspectives. Confronted with contemporary social challenges such as structural inequality and moral disintegration, it is imperative to revisit ethical values rooted in the Islamic tradition. The Qur’an underscores principles of justice, solidarity, social responsibility, and equality as foundational to a just and prosperous social order. Concurrently, Ibn Khaldūn’s theory of ʿasabiyyah highlights the centrality of social cohesion in sustaining collective strength. In contrast to Marx’s portrayal of religion as an opiate that diverts attention from socio-economic realities, Islam positions faith as a moral force driving social transformation. Employing a qualitative methodology and textual analysis of the primary sources of these three intellectual traditions, this study concludes that integrating Islamic social ethics with Ibn Khaldūn’s framework offers a viable conceptual alternative to secular critiques of religion and contributes to the construction of an ethically grounded social paradigm for contemporary society
References
Agustina, A. Y. (2006). The Meaning of the Holy Qur’an (11th ed.). Amana Publications.
Al-Jalālayn. (1999). Tafsīr al-Jalālayn. Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Qarādāwī, Y. (1999a). Fiqh al-Zakāh. Maktabah Wahbah.
Al-Qarādāwī, Y. (1999b). Nilai dan Norma dalam Al-Qur’an. Gema Insani Press.
Amalih, I., & Al-Haq, H. (2021). Keadilan sosial dalam Al-Qur’an: Tela’ah atas penafsiran Buya Hamka dalam Tafsir Al-Azhar. El-Waroqoh: Jurnal Ushuluddin dan Filsafat, 5(2). ISSN 2580-4014 (print); 2580-4022 (online).
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Damanik, A. (2019). Solidaritas sosial dalam pemikiran Ibnu Khaldun. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 7(2), 121.
Esposito, J. L. (2002). What Everyone Needs to Know about Islam. Oxford University Press.
Friyadi, R. ., & Hanani, S. . (2024). Analisis Pemikiran Ibnu Khaldun terhadap Interaksi Sosial Siswa di Sekolah. Indonesian Research Journal on Education, 4(4), 1624 –. https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v4i4.1411
Ibn Kathīr, I. (2003). Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-‘Aẓīm (Vol. 4). Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Ibn Khaldūn, ‘A. S. (1967). The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History (F. Rosenthal, Trans.). Princeton University Press.
Kamālī, M. H. (1999). Freedom, Equality and Justice in Islam. Islamic Texts Society.
Marx, K. (1844). A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (S. Rutland, Trans.). Progress Publishers.
Marx, K. (1848). The Communist Manifesto. International Publishers.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1846). The German Ideology. Prometheus Books.
Purwanto, H., Rofiq, A., & Mashudi. (2020). Halal assurance system (HAS) 23000 perspective George Robert Terry. IJIBEC: International Journal of Islamic Business and Economics, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.28918/ijibec.v4i2.2988
Pramono, M. F., Latief, M., & Raflie, A. S. (2024). Asabiyyah concept according to Ibn Khaldun: An effort to overcome Islamic political problems in Indonesia. PERSPEKTIF, 13(3), 785–792. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v13i3.11712
Saldaña, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Senjaya, T. (2023). Ibn Khaldun’s thoughts on religion as a personal experience and a social system. SCIENTIA: Social Sciences & Humanities, 2(1), 453–459. https://doi.org/10.51773/sssh.v2i1.193
Zainuddin, Z. (2018). Konsep ashabiyyah dalam pemikiran Ibnu Khaldun dan relevansinya dalam masyarakat modern. Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 12(1), 45.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 L. Ibnurusd Al Hafied, Samsahudi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



