Kajian Kitab Manhaj Zawi al-Nazhar Syarh Manzumah ‘Ala al-Atsar Karya Syaikh Mahfuz al-Tarmasi: Analisis Sistematis dan Metodologis

Authors

  • Amri Institut Agama Islam Negeri Datuk Laksemana Bengkalis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59240/kjsk.v5i2.327

Keywords:

Mahfuz at-Tarmsi, Method, Systematics, Syarh Tafshili, Syarh Lughawi

Abstract

This article aims to examine the book Manhaj Zawi al-Nazhar by Sheikh Mahfuz al-Tarmasi. The method used in this research is descriptive-analytical, focusing on how the book's systematics and methodology (dirasah ma fi al-kitab) are structured, rather than emphasizing dirasah ma haula al-Kitab, which encompasses the author's broader perspective. The results of the study indicate that the systematic approach used by Sheikh Mahfuzh in writing the book Manhaj Zawi al-Nazhar is similar to that of Al-Suyuthi, namely a combination of Ibn Shalah's method of prioritizing the classification of Hadith based on their quality, followed by the sequence and branches of ulum al-Hadith according to Ibn Hajar. The difference is that Sheikh Mahfuzh breaks down the discussion of the branches of Ulum al-Hadith into 81 branches, from the 69 branches of Ulum al-Hadith found in Al-Suyuthi's Alfiyah. The method of explaining the book Manhaj Zawi al-Nazhar, as seen from the structure of the explanation, uses the detailed explanation method or comprehensive explanation. However, when viewed from the approach used in the explanation, the book Manhaj Zawi al-Nazhar employs a linguistic explanation method, which can also be referred to as a comprehensive explanation method. This research has the urgency of enriching Islamic studies in the field of methodology. By enriching the methods used in Islamic studies, this will lead to an increase in Islamic scientific knowledge.

References

Abdullah, R., Idris, M. I. bin, & Asni, F. (2020). Analisis kehujahan ḥadīth dalam pengkaedahan sintaksis Arab menurut al-Suyuti. Journal of Hadith Studies, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.33102/johs.v5i2.115

Ahmad, A. U. (2008). Al-Syaikh al-Tarmasi wa sarhuhu li Alfiyah al-Suyuthi (Tesis, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia).

Alwi, Z., Rahman, A. R. J., Darussamin, Z., Darusman, D., & Akbar, A. A. (2023). Yusuf al-Qardhawi’s methodological reformulation of hadith thought and its influence on the development of hadith science: An analysis in the book of Kaifa Nata’amal Ma’a al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah. International Journal of Islamic Thought and Humanities, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.54298/ijith.v2i1.81

Amri, M. S. A. (2022). Kontradiksi, preferensi dan rekonsiliasi (al-Ta’arud wa al-Tarjih wa al-Jam’). Khuluqiyya: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Studi Islam, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.56593/khuluqiyya.v4i2.88

Dewi, E. D. L. P., Munthe, B., & Afriza, A. (2023). The contestation of the Malay Arabic and Roman literature: Shifts in culture, literature, and religion. Arabiyatuna, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v7i1.5654

Dhofier, Z. (1982). Tradisi pesantren: Studi tentang pandangan hidup kyai. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Faisal, A. F. (2018). Kontribusi Mahfuz al-Tarmasi dalam pengkajian hadis di Indonesia. Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 1(2).

Kurniati, Y. (2020). Rekonstruksi metodologi keilmuan syarah hadis klasik. Ilmu Ushuluddin, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30983/it.v4i1.2632

Lestari, S. H., & Asparina, A. (2020). Scientific approach toward hadith: A study of Zaglul al-Najjar’s work. Diroyah: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v5i1.9161

Masud, A. (2006). Dari Haramain ke Nusantara: Jejak intelektual arsitek pesantren. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Muhid, dkk. (2023). Epistemologi kitab syarah hadis Manhāj Dhawī al-Naẓar fī al-sharḥ Alfiyyah ‘Ilm al-Athar karya Syekh Maḥfūẓ Tarmas. El-Buhuth, 6(1).

Mujib, A. (2003). Intelektualisme pesantren. Jakarta: Diva Pustaka.

Mukhlies, F. (2010). Peranan Syaikh Mahfuzh al-Tarmasi dalam perkembangan ‘ulum al-hadits: Studi kitab Manhaj Dzawi al-Nazhar.

Mukminin. (2021). Karya intelektual Syekh Mahfudz al-Tarmasi dalam bidang hadis dan kontribusinya di Nusantara (1891–1920 M) (Skripsi, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta).

Qabili, M. Z. (n.d.). Review terhadap pemikiran fiqh Syeh Mahfudz Termas dalam kitab Hasyiah al-Termasi. Diakses dari https://dspace.uii.ac.id

Rahmadi. (2011). Pengantar metodologi penelitian. Banjarmasin: Antasari Press.

Rahman, F., et al. (2002). Wacana studi hadis kontemporer. Yogyakarta: PT Tiara Wacana Yogya.

Rohimah, L. (2018). Tasawuf dalam perspektif Muhammadiyah (Studi tokoh Abdur Razak Fakhruddin).

Sakdiyah, R., & Widayaningsih, R. C. (2018). Menjadi Islam Nusantara yang unggul (Studi atas kitab al-Minhah al-Khairiyah karya Mahfuzh at-Tarmasi). Millati, 3(2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.18326/mlt.v3i2.261-275

Tarmasi, M. M. (1978). Kifayah al-Mustafid. Beirut: Dar al-Basya`ir al-Islamiyah.

Tarmasi, M. M. (2008). Manhaj Dzawi al-Nazhar (Tahqiq F. M. Bahri et al.). Jakarta: Departemen Agama RI.

Toft, L. L. (2022). Dhū Nuwās and the martyrs of Najrān in Islamic Arabic literature until 1400 AD. Entangled Religions, 13. https://doi.org/10.46586/er.13.2022.9461

Ulinnuha, M. (2017). Peran Syekh Mahfuz at-Tarmasi (1868–1920 M) di bidang ilmu qiraat al-Qur’an. Jurnal Istiqro’, 15(1).

Yarmohammadi, H., Dalfardi, B., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2014). Al-Akhawayni Bukhari (?–983 AD). Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-7000-5

Downloads

Published

2025-08-29

How to Cite

Amri. (2025). Kajian Kitab Manhaj Zawi al-Nazhar Syarh Manzumah ‘Ala al-Atsar Karya Syaikh Mahfuz al-Tarmasi: Analisis Sistematis dan Metodologis. Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 5(2), 1232–1246. https://doi.org/10.59240/kjsk.v5i2.327