Perbandingan Administrasi Negara Indonesia Dengan Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59240/kjsk.v5i3.622Keywords:
Comparison, Administration, Country, Indonesia, MalaysiaAbstract
Public administration plays a crucial role in ensuring effective governance and the delivery of public services. Differences in administrative systems among countries influence policy implementation and bureaucratic performance. Indonesia and Malaysia, as neighboring countries in Southeast Asia, share certain historical and socio-cultural similarities but apply different systems of state administration. This study aims to compare the state administration systems of Indonesia and Malaysia by examining bureaucratic structure, public service delivery, and administrative reform. This research employs a qualitative approach using a comparative study method. Data were collected through literature review of scientific journals, books, and official government documents from both countries. The results show that Indonesia adopts a decentralized administrative system with a presidential form of government, while Malaysia implements a more centralized administrative system within a federal parliamentary framework. These differences affect bureaucratic coordination, efficiency, and public service implementation. In conclusion, both countries have strengths and weaknesses in their administrative systems, and comparative analysis can provide valuable insights for improving state administration in Indonesia.
ABSTRACT
Administrasi negara memiliki peran penting dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan dan pelayanan publik. Perbedaan sistem administrasi antarnegara berpengaruh terhadap pelaksanaan kebijakan dan kinerja birokrasi. Indonesia dan Malaysia sebagai negara bertetangga di kawasan Asia Tenggara memiliki kesamaan historis dan sosial budaya, namun menerapkan sistem administrasi negara yang berbeda. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan administrasi negara Indonesia dan Malaysia dengan meninjau struktur birokrasi, sistem pelayanan publik, serta pelaksanaan reformasi administrasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi komparatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi literatur terhadap jurnal ilmiah, buku, serta dokumen resmi pemerintah dari kedua negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia menerapkan sistem administrasi negara yang terdesentralisasi dengan bentuk pemerintahan presidensial, sedangkan Malaysia cenderung menerapkan sistem administrasi yang lebih terpusat dalam kerangka pemerintahan parlementer federal. Perbedaan tersebut memengaruhi koordinasi birokrasi, efisiensi, dan pelaksanaan pelayanan publik. Kesimpulannya, masing-masing negara memiliki kelebihan dan kelemahan dalam sistem administrasi negaranya, sehingga studi perbandingan dapat menjadi bahan evaluasi bagi peningkatan administrasi negara di Indonesia
References
Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. “Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, and Action.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33(2) (2017): 256–274.
Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., & Schillemans, T. The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: University Press., 2018.
Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (. “Public Sector Management Reform in Developing Countries.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 81(2) (2015): 222–240.
Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, D. A. Decentralizing Governance. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press., 2007.
Commonwealth Secretariat.2016. “Public Service Systems in ASEAN Countries.,” n.d.
Dwiyanto, A., Pramusinto, A., & Nurmandi, A. “Reformasi Birokrasi Publik Di Indonesia: Evaluasi Terkini.” Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara 24(2) (2018): 123–139.
Haque, M. S. “Governance Reforms in Southeast Asia.” International Journal of Public Administration 39(5) (2016): 379–391.
Muttakin, M. B., Khan, A., & Subramaniam, N. “Firm Characteristics, Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Bangladesh.” Pacific Accounting Review 27(3) (2015): 353–372.
OECD. “Public Governance Reforms in Southeast Asia.” OECD Journal on Budgeting 19(1) (2019): 1–28.
———. Public Governance Reviews: Indonesia. paris: OECD Publishing., 2016.
Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. “Public Administration in Times of Crisis.” Public Administration Review 80(5) (2020): 793–803.
Peters, B. G. The Politics of Bureaucracy. london: Routledge., 2018.
Sjahrir, B. S., Kis-Katos, K., & Schulze, G. G. “Political Budget Cycles in Indonesia.” Journal of Development Economics 121 (2016): 1–15.
UNDP. “Institutional Reform and Public Sector Performance in Asia-Pacific.” UNDP Governance Journal 2(2) (2020): 55–72.
Uwuigbe, U., & Ajibolade, S. O. “Effects of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure.” Journal of Banking and Finance 7(2) (2013): 42–54.
Wang, C. “Public Administration Reform and Governance in Developing Countries.” International Journal of Public Administration 39(9) (2016): 678–689.
World Bank. Improving Public Sector Performance in Malaysia. Washington DC: World Bank., 2019.
Yusoff, M. A., & Sarjoon, A.329–345. “Fiscal Governance and Budget Reforms in Malaysia.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 12(3) (2019): 329–345.
Zhang, Y., & Wang, X. “Legal Institutions and Public Administration Performance.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 87(4) (2021): 705–723.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rismatun Nikmah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
